Comparisons

EQBase vs SoundSource

Last checked: August 4, 2026 · SoundSource 6.1.1

These two apps get compared a lot, and they shouldn't be, not because one is better, but because they're answers to different questions. SoundSource is a control panel: its purpose is to put every app's audio exactly where you want it, with its own volume and its own effects. EQBase is an equalizer: its purpose is to change the sound of everything your Mac plays, precisely, and to add nothing else to the signal.

They overlap in the middle (both do per-app volume, both do system-wide EQ, both host Audio Units), which is why the comparison comes up. But the overlap is not where either of them is actually good.

Where SoundSource wins

Rogue Amoeba have been building Mac audio software for over twenty years and it shows. These are real advantages, and a comparison table from a competitor shouldn't bury them.

Where EQBase is different

These are the things EQBase was built to do that we don't find equivalents for in SoundSource's published documentation.

Feature comparison

EQBaseSoundSource
Price, one-time$79.99$49
Subscription option$4.99/mo
Free tier (no time limit)
Free trialn/a (free tier)
Minimum macOS14.015.0
Graphic EQ10-band10-band
Parametric EQ24 bands
Linear-phase & dynamic EQ
Separate left / right EQ
Balance & pan
Headphone corrections (AutoEQ)8,600+
Spectrum analyzer
Convolution / impulse responses
Crossfeed
Spatial / 3D effect
Volume boost+6 dBup to 400%
Per-app volume & mute
Per-app tone control3-band10-band
Per-app Audio Unit effects
Per-app output routing
Output to multiple devices at once8 per device
Virtual devices you can build4
Bus widthup to 64 chstereo
AirPlay outputnot stated
Audio Unit hosting, system-wide
Route apps into a virtual mic
Routing set up from a per-app menu
Channel-level routing matrix
Presets that follow device or app
Global hotkeys
Loudness-matched compare
Zero added latencynot stated
Live bit-perfect verificationnot stated
On the Mac App Store

A "–" means we could not find the feature in that product's published documentation, and "not stated" means the product makes no claim either way. Neither is a claim that something doesn't work. If we've got a detail wrong, tell us and we'll correct this page.

What they have in common

Both are direct downloads rather than Mac App Store apps, because both install an audio component that the App Store sandbox doesn't allow, which means a password prompt and a permission grant during setup either way. Both process every sound your Mac makes rather than one app at a time. Both do per-app volume, both host Audio Units, both use the AutoEQ project's measurements for headphone correction, and both can change what you're hearing based on which device you plugged in. Neither is a subscription trap: SoundSource is buy-once, and EQBase's one-time licence is a real option next to the monthly one.

A closer look at routing

Both apps route audio per app. They're shaped for different people, and this is where the choice actually gets made.

SoundSource optimises for immediacy. It lists the apps currently making noise and gives each one a pop-up menu to pick its output device. Nothing to set up, no concepts to learn. For "put Music on the DAC and leave everything else alone" it is simply the faster tool, and that convenience is worth real money.

EQBase optimises for what you can build. Routing (Pro) is a patchbay: you create a virtual device, feed it sources (specific apps, the System/Other bucket, hardware inputs, or another virtual device chained in) and send its mix out to monitors, meaning physical outputs. Up to four virtual devices run at once, each with up to eight monitors, on buses up to 64 channels wide, with a per-channel routing matrix rather than a single device picker. Each virtual device is also published as an input other apps can select, so Zoom, OBS or QuickTime can record exactly the mix you built.

So the split isn't "one does it, one doesn't". SoundSource gets you to a simple result faster; EQBase goes further once you're willing to build the graph. One app on a different speaker: SoundSource. A multi-channel bus feeding two monitors and a virtual microphone: EQBase. And if your routing needs outgrow both, Rogue Amoeba's Loopback is the dedicated tool, as a separate purchase.

Can you run both?

We haven't tested that combination and we're not going to claim it works. Both apps insert themselves into the system audio path, so running them together means chaining two audio layers and hoping the order comes out the way you intended. In principle SoundSource routes and EQBase processes, so it isn't absurd, but it isn't a configuration we support or can help you debug. Pick one.

How to decide

Ask what you were actually annoyed about when you started looking. "My headphones sound wrong", "this recording is too bright", "I want my measured room correction applied properly": that's an EQ problem, and it's what EQBase is for. "I want my music on the good speakers while everything else stays on the laptop" is a routing problem. Both apps solve it, but SoundSource solves it in one menu, so unless you also want the EQ depth it's the easier purchase.

EQBase's free tier costs nothing and never expires, so the EQ question is cheap to settle: install it, load your headphone profile, and see whether the sound was the problem. Pro adds the parametric, linear-phase and convolution tools and carries a 14-day refund. If you're not yet sure you need any of this, start with does macOS have a built-in equalizer? If the problem is one loud app drowning out another, see per-app volume control on a Mac.

Download EQBase free

Comparison compiled August 4, 2026 from rogueamoeba.com and the SoundSource manual (SoundSource 6.1.1, released July 30, 2026). SoundSource and Rogue Amoeba are not affiliated with EQBase or Bold Biscuit. Prices and features change; check their site before buying. See also SoundSource alternatives, EQBase vs eqMac and EQBase vs Boom 3D.